Reading for MUD
|
M Main Ideas |
|
|
U Understanding (What does the author want me to remember about this?) |
|
|
D Significant Details |
MUD – Rubric (50 points)
|
Criterion |
Advanced – 4 |
Proficient – 3 |
Basic – 2 |
Minimal – 1 |
|
MUD Template |
Template completely filled out Multiple entries in each box Entries show depth of thought and significant insight into content (10 pts) |
Template completely filled out Multiple entries in each box Entries show depth of thought and insight into content (8.5 pts) |
Template completely filled out One or more entries in each box Entries show surface understanding of content (7 pts) |
Template incomplete Or Content very minimal and lacking in depth of comprehension (5.5 pts) |
|
Reflection on the Activity |
Reflection on the process is complete and insightful Reflection includes personal insights gained while completing the process (10 pts) |
Reflection on the process is complete and insightful (8.5 pts) |
Reflection on the process is present but minimal (7 pts) |
Little to no reflection (5.5 pts) |
|
Improving comprehension |
Discussion on how this process can help students improve comprehension skills is targeted towards specific comprehension strategies and ways to implement the strategy into class instruction (10 pts) |
Discussion on how this process can help students improve comprehension skills is targeted towards specific comprehension strategies (8.5 pts) |
Discussion is presented but not directed towards specific comprehension strategies or skills. (7 pts) |
Little to no substantive discussion is present. (5.5 pts) |
|
Strategies for improvement InTASC 8 CAEP R1.3 |
Suggestions for improvement of process focused on increasing student achievement and effectiveness of instruction; Suggestions are precise and identify specific instructional strategies or techniques (10 pts) |
Suggestions for improvement of process focused on increasing student achievement and effectiveness of instruction (8.5 pts) |
Suggestions for improvement of process focused on increasing student achievement OR effectiveness of instruction (7 pts) |
Little to no substantive suggestions for improvement of the activity are presented (5.5 pts) |
|
APA formatting x 1 |
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (NO errors) (5 pts.) |
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (1-2 MINOR errors). (4.25) |
Limited (3-5) APA errors in APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (3.5 pts.) |
More than 5 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (2.75 pts) |
|
Mechanics x 1 |
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS. (5 pts.) |
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, (1-2 MINOR errors). (4.25) |
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors). (3.5 pts.) |
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5 errors). (2.75 pts) |
