ghfhgfghfhgfhgfh

Smart Nursing Papers - Nursing Questions - ghfhgfghfhgfhgfh
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDiagnostic ModelProvide a comprehensive review of the change diagnostic model chosen that details the components included, as well as some background about the model itself through research from the author(s).
15 to >13.5 Pts

Excellent

The review of the change diagnostic model has great details regarding the background of the model through research.

 13.5 to >12.0 Pts

Competent

The review of the change diagnostic model has some details regarding the background of the model through research.

 12 to >10.5 Pts

Limited

The review of the change diagnostic model has limited details regarding the background of the model through research.

 10.5 to >9.0 Pts

Poor

The review of the change diagnostic model has poor details regarding the background of the model through research.

 9 to >0 Pts

Unacceptable

The paper did not meet this competency.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDocumentation and FormattingPaper is properly referenced according to APA guidelines with at least four references, properly cited and in-text citations included.
10 to >9.0 Pts

Excellent

The paper is properly referenced according to APA guidelines and has at least four references with in-text citations.

 9 to >8.0 Pts

Competent

The paper is missing one reference, but the student used APA correctly and has at least three references with most in-text citations.

 8 to >7.0 Pts

Limited

The paper is missing two to three references, and the student uses APA inconsistently and has at least two references with some in-text citations.

 7 to >6.0 Pts

Poor

The paper is missing more than three references and the student uses APA inconsistently and has at least one reference with some in-text citations.

 6 to >0 Pts

Unacceptable

The paper did not meet this competency. There are no references nor supporting in-text citations.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeModel RationaleInclude your rationale defending why that particular model was selected. You can utilize a review of internal and external pressures that have affected the companies chosen.
20 to >18.0 Pts

Excellent

The paper includes a supported rational defending the model selected. A review of internal and external pressures are greatly explained.

 18 to >16.0 Pts

Competent

The paper includes a somewhat supported rational defending the model selected. A review of internal and external pressures are somewhat explained.

 16 to >14.0 Pts

Limited

The paper includes a limited supported rational defending the model selected. A review of internal and external pressures are limitedly explained.

 14 to >12.0 Pts

Poor

The paper did not include a supported rational defending the model selected. A review of internal and external pressures are poorly explained.

 12 to >0 Pts

Unacceptable

The paper did not meet this competency.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSWOT AnalysisCreate a SWOT analysis based on the above. Compare the two company analyses to each other and offer your perspective (value judgment) of the effectiveness of the changes made to date in each case.
20 to >18.0 Pts

Excellent

The paper includes a thorough description of the SWOT analysis comparing the two companies of the changes.

 18 to >16.0 Pts

Competent

The paper includes a somewhat description of the SWOT analysis comparing the two companies of the changes.

 16 to >14.0 Pts

Limited

The paper includes a limited description of the SWOT analysis comparing the two companies of the changes.

 14 to >12.0 Pts

Poor

The paper has a poor description of the SWOT analysis comparing the two companies of the changes.

 12 to >0 Pts

Unacceptable

The paper did not meet this competency.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAreas of ResistanceAddress potential areas of resistance that were encountered or that you anticipate may be encountered and possible actions to minimize the negative effects of such resistance.
20 to >18.0 Pts

Excellent

The paper addresses the potential areas of resistance that were encountered or that you anticipate may be encountered and possible actions to minimize the negative effects of such resistance.

 18 to >16.0 Pts

Competent

The paper addresses somewhat the potential areas of resistance that were encountered or that you anticipate may be encountered and possible actions to minimize the negative effects of such resistance.

 16 to >14.0 Pts

Limited

The paper is limited in addressing the potential areas of resistance that were encountered or that you anticipate may be encountered and possible actions to minimize the negative effects of such resistance.

 14 to >12.0 Pts

Poor

The paper is poorly addressing the potential areas of resistance that were encountered or that you anticipate may be encountered and possible actions to minimize the negative effects of such resistance.

 12 to >0 Pts

Unacceptable

The paper did not meet this competency.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRecommendationsInclude recommendations for further actions within the organizations and the rationale chosen for these recommendations.
11 to >10.0 Pts

Excellent

Provided recommendations for further actions within the organizations and the rationale chosen for these recommendations.

 10 to >9.0 Pts

Competent

Provided some recommendations for further actions within the organizations and the rationale chosen for these recommendations.

 9 to >8.0 Pts

Limited

Provided limited recommendations for further actions within the organizations and the rationale chosen for these recommendations.

 8 to >7.0 Pts

Poor

Provided poor recommendations and a lack for further actions within the organizations and the rationale chosen for these recommendations.

 7 to >0 Pts

Unacceptable

The paper did not meet this competency.

11 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeHRM.PLO-B HREmploy an interdisciplinary perspective for strategic leadership, HR management and decision making so as to add value to the overall success of a business enterprise.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 PtsExcellent: The paper includes clear evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective.

3 PtsCompetent: The paper provides most evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective.

2 PtsFair: The paper provides some evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective.

1 PtsPoor: The paper provides little evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective.

0 PtsUnacceptable: The paper provides very little or no evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective.

4 pts

Total points: 100