Acquiring Employees – Rubric
Needs Assessment 24 points
Criteria Description
Paper includes needs assessment and areas for potential growth.
5. Target 24 points
A comprehensive needs assessment is included and well developed. The needs
assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes multiple examples
from each area analyzed.
4. Acceptable 20.88 points
A detailed needs assessment is included and complete. The needs assessment
addresses areas for potential growth and includes at least one example from each
area analyzed.
3. Approaching 18.96 points
A needs assessment is included and complete but minimally addresses areas for
potential growth.
2. Insufficient 17.76 points
A needs assessment matrix is included but is incomplete or lacks detail.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Job Analysis 24 points
Criteria Description
Paper includes job analysis and ties to the needs assessment information.
5. Target 24 points
A comprehensive job analysis is included and well developed. The job analysis
covers several relevant job requirements, related candidate capabilities, and other
essentials. Analysis clearly ties to the needs assessment information.
4. Acceptable 20.88 points
Collapse All
A detailed job analysis is included and is thorough and complete. The job analysis
covers relevant job requirements, related candidate capabilities, and other
essentials. Analysis ties to the needs assessment information.
3. Approaching 18.96 points
A job analysis is included and complete but minimally covers relevant job
requirements, related candidate capabilities, and other essentials. Analysis
somewhat ties to the needs assessment information.
2. Insufficient 17.76 points
Job Description 36 points
Criteria Description
Paper includes job description with details of corporate research to determine
necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job
description.
5. Target 36 points
A job description is included and provides details of corporate research conducted
during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary
knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job
description. The job description is clear and well developed to appeal to potential
candidates.
4. Acceptable 31.32 points
A job description is included and provides details of corporate research conducted
during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary
knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job
description.
3. Approaching 28.44 points
Job description is included. A job analysis is conducted to determine necessary
knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job
description.
2. Insufficient 26.64 points
Job description is incomplete or lacks detail
Job Description Layout 12 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Target 12 points
The job description layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is
appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and
colors enhance the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable 10.44 points
The job description layout background and text complement each other and enable
the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies
appropriately for headings and text.
3. Approaching 9.48 points
The job description uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.
Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics,
bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
2. Insufficient 8.88 points
The job description layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or
distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall
readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or
busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
Evidence 12 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target 12 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives
are integrated effectively.
4. Acceptable 10.44 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
3. Approaching 9.48 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2. Insufficient 8.88 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Mechanics of Writing 6 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 6 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 4.74 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 4.44 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Format/Documentation 6 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 4.74 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 4.44 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
Total 120 points
