Selection Process – Rubric
Detailed Description of Interview Process 27.5 points
Criteria Description
Paper includes description for the interview process that addresses the requirements
for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations
conducted.
5. Target 27.5 points
A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description
accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process,
incorporating research based on observations conducted.
4. Acceptable 23.93 points
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description
addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research
based on observations conducted.
3. Approaching 21.73 points
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description
minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.
2. Insufficient 20.35 points
A detailed description for the interview process is included but is incomplete or
lacks details.
Testing Options 22 points
Criteria Description
Paper includes multiple testing options with justification for using them during the
interview process.
5. Target 22 points
Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them
during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the
testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the
organization.
Collapse All
4. Acceptable 19.14 points
Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed
explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.
3. Approaching 17.38 points
One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal
explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.
2. Insufficient 16.28 points
Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.
Interview Questions 27.5 points
Criteria Description
Paper includes interview process covering four behavioral and four situational
questions.
5. Target 27.5 points
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The
questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions
developed in previous assignments.
4. Acceptable 23.93 points
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The
questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
3. Approaching 21.73 points
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.
2. Insufficient 20.35 points
The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they
are incomplete or lack details.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 7.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully
directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable 6.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
directed to a specific audience.
3. Approaching 6.08 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the
appropriate audience is demonstrated.
2. Insufficient 5.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 8.8 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target 8.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.
The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous
conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable 7.66 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
3. Approaching 6.95 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient 6.51 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
Evidence 5.5 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target 5.5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives
are integrated effectively.
4. Acceptable 4.79 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
3. Approaching 4.35 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2. Insufficient 4.07 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Mechanics of Writing 5.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.79 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 4.35 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 4.07 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Format/Documentation 5.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 5.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 4.79 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 4.35 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 4.07 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsTotal 110 points
